The Second Crash – On the Way and Unstoppable
By Doug Hornig, Editor, BIG
GOLD
Tuesday, October 9, 2007 started as a nice day in New York City.
A lovely early fall day, with the temperature still a balmy 80° at
2:00 in the morning. By evening, though, the temperature had dropped
twenty degrees, the clouds had rolled in, there was thunder and rain.
As with the weather, there were some hints of trouble here and there
on Wall Street. But all in all, things could not have seemed better.
Little did we know, the stormy end of 10/9/07 signaled a very large
bubble that had just popped.
That was the day when the Dow Jones Industrial Average hit its historic
peak. From there, it was all downhill -- slowly but steadily at first,
and then violently after last August -- until the Dow bottomed (for
now) on March 9 of this year. Over that span, the index lost 54% of
its value.
It’s been a crushing blow to just about everyone. But it’s already
being referred to as the crash. As if the unpleasantness
were now all behind us. More likely, in the future it will be seen
as, simply, the first crash.
Don’t believe it? In a moment you will, when you see the scariest
graph of the year.
But let’s quickly recall what’s already happened. During the late,
great housing boom, interest rates were at microscopic levels, while
bankers were encouraged to grant home loans on little more than a
wink and a nudge. In order to inflate their balance sheets, those
bankers resorted to all sorts of gimmicky, adjustable rate mortgages
(ARMs), whose common feature was an interest rate that would eventually
reset. That is, it would balloon somewhere down the road. And those
most likely to come quickly to grief were the riskiest borrowers,
who held loans known as “subprime.”
“But not to worry,” borrowers were told. “Betting on ever-rising
home prices is the safest wager in the whole wide world. If you have
problems with cash flow when the ARM resets, your house will be worth
a lot more, so you can simply sell it and walk away with a nice chunk
of change in your pocket.” Uh-huh.
The bankers themselves were a little more concerned about the deterioration
of their portfolios. They took out insurance in the form of credit
default swaps (CDSs). These were a brand-new invention in world financial
history, allowing mortgages to be sold and resold until they were
leveraged 20 times over. They became the shakiest part of a huge global
derivatives market, with a nominal value in the tens of trillions
of dollars.
For a while, this Ponzi scheme even worked. But then, as they had
to, the ARMs began resetting, and there were defaults. Then more of
them. Because at the same time, the housing market was cooling off
and the economy was stalling out. More and more people were trapped
in a situation where they owed more on their home than they could
sell it for. Many simply mailed their keys to the bank and moved on.
All of this wreaked havoc in the derivatives market. Sellers of these
exotic packages could no longer establish what they were worth. Buyers
couldn’t determine a fair price and so stopped buying. As the ripples
spread through the world financial system, trust disappeared and liquidity
dried up.
Now consider that the base cause for all that dislocation was the
subprime sector. And how big is that? Not very. Subprime mortgages
account for only about 15% of all home loans. Their influence has
been way out of proportion to their numbers, because of derivatives.
Here’s the good news: the subprime meltdown has about run its course.
These loans were resetting en masse in 2007 and the first eight months
of ’08. Now they’re pretty much done.
And the bad news? No one in the mainstream media seems to be asking
what should be a pretty obvious question: What about loans other
than subprime? Truth is, the banks didn’t just trick up their
subprime loans. ARMs were the order of the day – across the board.
Now, here’s that frightening graph we referred to earlier.
Take a good, long look. You can see that from the beginning of 2007
through September of 2008, subprime loans (the gray bars above) were
resetting like crazy. Those are the ones people were walking away
from, sending a shockwave from defaults and foreclosures smack into
the middle of the economy. Now they’re gone.
The ARM market got very quiet between December 2008 and March 2009,
hitting a low that won’t be seen again until November of 2011. Small
wonder a few “green shoots” have poked their heads above ground. But
in April, resets began to increase and will reach an intermediate
peak in June. After that, they tail off a little, going basically
flat for the next ten months.
It’s not until May of 2010 that the next wave really hits. From there
to October of 2011, the resets will be coming fast and furious. That’s
18 months of further turmoil in the housing market, and the beginning
is still nearly a year away! (Although the months in between are likely
to be no picnic, either.)
While it isn’t subprime ARMs that are resetting this time, neither
are they prime loans. Those eligible for prime loans wisely tended
to stay away from ARMs in the first place, as indicated by the relatively
small space they take up on each bar.
No, the next to go are Alt-A’s (the white bars), Option ARMs (green)
and Unsecuritized ARMs (blue). Alt-A’s are loans to the folks who
are a small step up from subprime. Unsecuritized loans are a 50-50
proposition; either the borrowers were good enough that they weren’t
thrown into the CDS pool, or they were so risky no one would insure
them.
Those two are bad enough. But Option ARMs are the real black sheep,
loans with choices on how large a payment the borrower will make.
The options include interest-only or, worse, a minimum payment
that is less than interest-only, leading to “negative amortization”—a
loan balance that continually gets bigger, not smaller. Imagine what
happens with those when the piper calls.
Once the carnage begins, will it be as bad as the subprime crisis?
That’s the $64K question. Perhaps not. For one thing, subprime loans
were a much larger chunk of the market when they started going south.
For another, there’s been a lot of refinancing as interest rates dropped;
that should help ease the default rate. And the government has massively
intervened, with measures designed to prop up those who would otherwise
lose their homes.
On the other hand, we’re in a severe recession, which wasn’t the
case when the subprime crisis started. More people will be unable
to meet payments. And the housing market has continued to decline,
pressuring both marginal homeowners and banks that can’t sell foreclosed
properties.
Is the stock market’s next 10/9/07 on the way? Yes. Which day will
it be? That’s unknowable. It could be in a week, or not for another
year.
But make no mistake about it, the second crash is coming.
It can’t be prevented, no matter what desperate measures Obama and
his hapless financial advisors come up with. All we can hope for is
that, with a little luck, it won’t be as severe as the first one.
But it will last longer. We aren’t even in the middle of the woods
yet, much less on the way out.
The order of the day is to be very defensive. There will be few safe
havens, but they do exist. Read our report on “48 Karat Gold,” a gold-related,
conservative investment that has continued going up even while the
common stock market bombed. It’s not too late to profit… click
here to learn more. __________________________________________________________________
The Price of Oil - How
did it get here, and where is it going? By Marin Katusa, Senior
Editor, Casey
Energy Opportunities
What a difference a year makes.
While March lions and April showers were at work in 2008, so were
these factors in the U.S. and global economies:
- The Dow Jones Industrial Average remained steady above 12,000.
- The leading indicator of existing home sales was down over 21%
from the previous year, and the official unemployment rate was just
beginning its upward creep by crossing the 5% mark.
- The first official admissions of the “R” word. In early April
2008, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) declared a 25% chance
of a global recession, and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke
told Congress that gross domestic product “could even contract slightly.”
- The novelty of bailouts began. Bernanke also assured Congress
that the Fed's emergency authorization of a loan against $29 billion
of Bear Stearns assets wasn't putting taxpayer money at risk: “I
feel reasonably confident that we'll be able to recover all the
principal and indeed some interest, and there is some chance of
even upside beyond that.”
- The dollar's six-year slide against the euro, hitting its lowest
ever at $1.60 in late April. It also fell below the 7-yuan mark
in China for the first time.
- And oil, comfortably above $100/barrel, was heading for its summer
crest of $147.
A scant 12 months later, the Dow is trying to stagger back from a
plunge to 6,500. Home sales are hinting a possible turnaround, unemployment
(even the official, conservative figures) is expected to reach double
digits before long, “recession” and “bailout” are household words
(often accompanied by four-letter ones), the dollar is recovering...
and a barrel of oil is worth half that hundred dollars. Hardly worth
pulling out of the ground.
What happened? And even more important for us as investors, what's
going to happen?
The Casey
Energy Opportunities team pulled together the pieces of the
oil sector picture that other sources tend to scatter or ignore.
We’ll give you a broader understanding of the drivers within the
oil industry, the markets in which they operate, and how you can
use that knowledge to push your profits upward.
The Oil Industry Now: A Rock, a Hard Place, and a Supply
Glut That Isn't
Everyone who drives a car or heats a home with petroleum has welcomed
the fall in oil prices from their high in the summer of 2008.
While it's hard to argue that filling your tank at $2 per gallon
is a lot easier on the wallet than $4 or $5 per gallon, the broader
economic effects of such low oil prices are troubling.
Leading the concerns is the drop in oil exploration and drilling
that accompany a drop in price. Below the $50/barrel mark – and for
many companies the bar is closer to $65 even for conventional fields
– oil producers typically spend more money getting oil out of the
ground than they can recoup by selling it. At the same time, turbulent
financial markets have tightened credit. These two factors have pressured
producers to allocate exploration budgets away from drilling projects
and toward meeting debt obligations and day-to-day operating costs
instead.
The plunge in prices has consumed the cash buffers of even the major
oil companies. ConocoPhillips, for example, announced in January that
along with eliminating 1,300 jobs and writing down $34 billion in
assets, it was also planning to cut its 2009 investment budget by
18%. Exploration projects are part of both writedowns and spending
cuts. The results of curtailed exploration are two-fold. First, some
oil companies will be simply unable to survive the economic crisis.
Second, supply in the longer term is being sacrificed to stay afloat
now.
Storage facilities are bulging. The chart below shows the contents
of the Cushing, OK, storage facility — where NYMEX deliveries take
place — have recently doubled from their average 2008 volume. Along
with a host of other facilities around the world, it got this way
because of an unusually dramatic contango at the beginning of 2009.
(A contango is a kind of market inversion, when the current [spot]
price dips lower than the future price.)
In January, the spot price of oil plummeted as low as $37/barrel,
while futures for July delivery were trading for $52. That meant if
an oil company could buy and store product for seven months, it could
lay out $37/barrel and be guaranteed a profit of $15 – or 40%, minus
costs – in July. And indeed the buying frenzy took off, reinforcing
the decision to turn off the drills.
So for the moment, we are artificially flush with oil, and demand
has dropped as the global economy will likely shrink for the first
time since World War II. It’s no surprise that oil prices have been
staying down.
Many analysts say we won't feel the effects of declining exploration
for a few years. But the numbers are emerging already. According to
the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), non-OPEC countries
demonstrated an average annual growth in supply of 570,000 barrels/day
from 2000 through 2007. In contrast, they recorded a drop last
year of some 300,000 barrels/day.
At the same time, OPEC appears to be conforming to its production
cuts of 4.2 million barrels/day, begun in September 2008. The oil
cartel is known to announce cuts that its members don't actually follow;
it's in their economic best interest, if only in the short term, to
sell all they can. But this time, oil has plunged far below levels
to sustain their economies. Even Saudi Arabia expects to run a budget
deficit this year.
OPEC, which produces about 40% of the world's oil, would like to
see prices around $75/barrel, at least. But the fragile global economy
would have a difficult time absorbing such a price at the moment,
and the cartel decided against further production cuts when it met
in March. In fact, some three weeks later, Saudi Arabia actually announced
a price cut on all its grades of crude to European, North American,
and Mediterranean markets – a dramatic attempt to spur demand amidst
high inventories.
So, entwined as it is with the economy, the oil industry is currently
in a conundrum. The fix it requires – higher prices for its product
– will choke the framework in which it operates.
At the same time, we've got supply problems ahead.
How Did We Get Here Anyway?
Like many aspects of the markets, movements in price are driven partly
by real factors and partly by perception. Rags-to-riches-to-rags-to-riches
Texas oilwoman Sue Sanders summed it up when she noted wryly in her
1940 autobiography that “nothing succeeds like reports of success.”
Last year's run-up of oil was no exception: part real, part report.
Some of the real factors:
- The weak U.S. dollar. The United States is not
the only country that buys oil in U.S. dollars. The price per barrel
is pegged to it, in fact. When the dollar is weak, the cost of U.S.
exports drops; and indeed by December 2008, the U.S. trade deficit
had fallen to its lowest in nearly six years ($39.9 billion, according
to U.S. Commerce Department data). However, a weak dollar means
it takes more dollars to buy a barrel of oil. Global concerns over
the strength of the U.S. economy, including America's ever-rising
level of debt, had undermined the dollar to the point that OPEC
members began to murmur about dumping it for the euro or a basket
of currencies.
- Geopolitical turbulence in oil-producing countries. The
Iraq war, oil-related militancy in Nigeria, and Iran-Israel-U.S.
posturing over nuclear issues were hotspots in the first half of
2008. The average nightly news covered casualties in Iraq, but industry
watchers tracked attacks on pipelines and oil facilities. Likewise,
in Nigeria, sabotage and oil worker kidnappings by militant groups
such as the Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta (MEND)
regularly shut down facilities to repair, negotiate, or improve
security. And as spring warmed up, so did the war of words between
Iran and Israel. By early July, Iran had gone so far to indicate
it would move against shipping in the Persian Gulf if attacked.
The United States would have moved next, of course... thus driving
up the price of oil in the jittery oil markets, which depend on
Persian Gulf shipping lanes.
- Unusually low crude and gasoline supplies entering the
2008 summer driving season. In early April, the EIA reported
significant drops in supply – gasoline declined by 4.53 million
barrels and crude oil by 3.2 million barrels, a one-two blow that
surprised and worried industry watchers. Behind the gasoline slump
were lower refinery margins, called crack spreads. In mid-March,
when refineries would normally be coming off their maintenance
schedules to churn out gasoline for summer driving, the margin
for turning a barrel of crude into gasoline was negative for the
first time in three years. Refineries sought profits in other
oil products, and the markets responded to the expected imbalance
in supply and demand.
- High demand. China is a stand-out here, and for
more than its usual energy appetite. China has a penchant for aiming
to break records – from its goals in five-year plans and building
projects to its haul of Olympic medals – and in the first half of
2008, it was visited by some dramatic examples: a great earthquake
and major snowstorms, events that disrupted the country’s energy
industry. Combine that with the fact that China was also preparing
for the Beijing Olympics in August, and it’s easy to understand
why it was buying oil very heavily until mid-summer.
On the perception side of price drivers, it's hard to overlook the
fact that the market push stayed strong in the face of increasingly
gloomy economic data. Casey Research was earlier than most in predicting
the economic crash (we published reports such as “The Coming Currency
Crisis” in June 2006), but by spring 2008, even officialdom was dancing
around the word recession.
Normally, news of burgeoning foreclosures, plummeting home sales,
spiking personal and business bankruptcies, rising unemployment, and
other economic indicators would tend to exert a bearish influence.
After all, consumers generate 70% of U.S. economic activity, and if
they stop or cut back on driving to work or the shopping mall, telephone
relatives or business partners instead of flying out to see them,
reduce purchases of items containing plastics, turn down the thermostat,
and other weather-the-storm measures, oil consumption should decline.
It took months for all these drivers to realign – but as we all know,
they did, and then some. The chicken-and-egg debate, whether oil's
sky shot triggered or portended the economic debacle in the closing
months of 2008, will require more distance and data to resolve. But
it's true that the dollar had started its comeback by mid-summer,
supply had caught up, geopolitics had settled a bit, China backed
off on its buying, no major hurricanes hit – but economic realities
did.
Meanwhile, Congress jumped up and down and cried “Speculators!” “OPEC!”
“Oil producers!” in tidy sound bites.
The Next Big Plays: Where You Need to Be
Oil companies are influenced by the range of market drivers and economic
conditions according to size. The junior oil producers, those with
market capitalizations of $250 million or less, have the small-business
advantage of flexibility when times are good. These times aren't good,
of course, and even well-managed juniors with good projects are in
trouble. Their vulnerability is in the credit market. You’ve likely
heard of credit lines being revoked and refinancings denied to people
with impeccable credit. Now imagine pitching a drill project without
a wallet full of assets ready to lay on the table.
Mid-tier producers, with market caps between $250 million to $2 billion,
will look to mergers and acquisitions to survive. The majors ($2-20
billion market cap) and Big Oil (over $20 billion) will also be shopping.
With low oil prices shutting down exploration, development, and even
production, these companies will be looking to replace their reserves
instead by purchasing smaller, solid companies with proven production.
It's simply cheaper.
We see two ways to profit from this trend.
First, we buy shares in undervalued, producing companies that are
profitable even below $40/barrel, are best of peer, and own large
reserves. These are the companies that Big Oil will be looking to
acquire. One such company, an oil sands producer, is
currently a part of the Casey
Energy Opportunities portfolio.
Second, we believe that owning a potential consolidator is the best
position. As debt load and low commodity prices overtake them, junior
producers will be forced to consolidate their projects. We currently
own one such candidate, and are scouting for others with such muscle.
Consolidators will be purchasing projects from the bank at 25 to 30
cents on the dollar.
Our tactics have already paid off handsomely in the last six months:
all our recent recommendations have been on fire. A few tripled their
value, and one generated a return of 540%.
As we’ve seen, supply problems are looming, no matter what timetable
of Peak Oil you may believe in. With increased demand inevitably come
higher prices. Our approach at Casey Energy Opportunities positions
us to take advantage of the trend in both the short and longer term.
And we guide our subscribers not only when to buy or sell, but also
when to take profits and a “Casey Free Ride” to eliminate risk.
We’d like to offer you the opportunity to kick the tires of Casey
Energy Opportunities RISK-FREE for 90 days, with 100% money-back guarantee. Click
here to give it a try._________________________________________________________________
Gold Stocks – the Best Strategy for Portfolio
Building
by Jeff Clark, Editor of BIG
GOLD
October 27, 2008 was the gold mining sector’s Black Monday, the day
nearly every stock hit rock bottom. Hindsight makes it plain they
got caught in the violent deleveraging that sucked down every equities
market in the world.
The broader markets were of course making year-to-date lows at the
same time, and unlike gold stocks, they continued falling after a
short intermission. In fact, the Dow fell 2,000 points after Obama
was elected. In sharp contrast, the mining stocks went on a tear.
Between November ’08 and January ’09, many of our BIG
GOLD picks made substantial gains, rising anywhere from 45% to
149%.
This good news isn’t the whole story, of course; many mining stocks
saw percentage losses greater than the broader market averages during
the Big Selloff. But given the fact that gold stocks started rebounding
while the broader markets continued lower, the BIG GOLD portfolio
ended the year down 24% while the S&P lost 38%. We were also glad
to see our portfolio responded better than the HUI; the broad-based
mining index lost 32% on the year. Meanwhile, the demand for physical
gold and silver was surging, likely attributed to investors who’d
been spooked by the broad meltdown.
We held on to our shares throughout the selloff and advised our readers
to do the same – and subsequently watched our stocks rebound mightily.
And we fully expect these kinds of surges to repeat as gold pushes
higher. Keep in mind that the real mania is yet to come.
Once inflation responds to the Federal Reserve’s ongoing monetary
foolishness, gold will need a space suit and our miners oxygen masks.
A key point to remember going forward is that gold mining shares constitute
a minute fraction of the global equities market, and a small shift
in investor interest toward our sector can move gold stocks sharply
higher in a big hurry. The market cap of the fifteen largest gold
producers in the world -- combined -- is a paltry $125 billion. That’s
barely more than a single company such as General Electric, at $116B;
much less than Microsoft ($175B); and waaay less than Exxon Mobil
at $400B.
Miners have also had a temporary respite from high energy costs due
to the collapse in the price of crude oil. Energy is one of the biggest
expenses a miner has to carry. As energy prices came down, the cost
of producing gold also declined, fattening the bottom line. Oil is
likely to get back to and then beyond $143 per barrel at some point,
but not for a while. We doubt it will top $75 this year, which is
enormously helpful for our companies.
Recently, gold stocks have outperformed bullion, a trend we’re keeping
an eye on and one we’re confident will continue in the future, especially
when we see the certain emergence of serious inflation and the dollar
resumes its downtrend.
So… what to do now?
What we hope you’ve been doing all along. Our general rules: If you’re
already fully committed to this sector, stay the course; you will
be well rewarded.
For those with money still to invest, accumulate well-run, sound companies
on weakness. Volatility will continue; we expect days and weeks marked
by retracement in the prices of even the best companies. The dips
will be your buying opportunities. Place below-market bids and let
the price come to you. Take positions with half or so of the funds
you’ve allotted for this sector, then fill out your portfolio with
whatever bargains come your way.
Whether you’re already full-up with gold stocks or are just getting
started, you should be well positioned before the all-out mania for
gold stocks hits.
The Quandary of Timing
It may surprise some to hear that we are not “all-in” yet with our
portfolio. Why? Because our attitude is one of caution, and because
we know that our big gains since October could get clawed back, partly
or wholly, by another reversal – which would lead to another buying
opportunity we wouldn’t want to miss.
But caution can be expensive when the market runs away from you.
What if the train has already left the station? In that case, those
waiting on a pullback will be disappointed. Just as all below-market
bids placed on October 28 of last year went unfilled, so could today’s,
or tomorrow’s.
Looking as little as a year out, our money is confidently on our stocks
going higher – much higher. We expect the government’s assorted “stimulus”
packages to fail to deliver as advertised, and usher in high inflation.
This will push gold and gold stocks much higher.
But the question is, if the broader markets head lower, will gold
stocks follow them down or ride on gold’s coattails?
That question leaves you in a quandary only if you’re looking at the
short term. Or if you get emotional about this stuff. Those with no
stomach left after the gut-wrenching selloff into last October probably
shouldn’t deviate from the cautious strategy outlined above. If you’re
one of those who see the big picture and ignore the gyrations along
the way – which is what Doug Casey does – then you’re drawn to the
idea of placing a bet when you judge that the odds are in your favor.
It’s when you see the price of something is far less than its value
that you can have the confidence to load up, whether that’s today
or perhaps later this summer.
Whether you buy today or wait in hopes of a pullback, we believe you’ll
be looking at profits a year from now. In the big picture, our stocks
are still deeply undervalued, even after so many of them have doubled
off their lows. But could they retreat again? In a general market
pullback, definitely. Could they tread water for a while? Certainly.
And could they leave present levels in the dust and double again from
here? Absolutely.
There are times when one must put away the crystal ball and simply prepare
for more than one scenario. This is one of them. Whether you respond
more conservatively or more aggressively, keep your eye on the endgame.
We think you’ll be glad you did.
Prudent precious metals strategies for conservative investors – that’s what BIG
GOLD is all about. And now that the gold price is going up again, you shouldn’t
wait to jump on the bandwagon. Read in our latest report why super-low interest
rates mean we could see $1,500/oz gold this year – click
here to learn more.